Fact Sheet No. 10:
Voluntary Compliance

What is Voluntary Compliance?

This is when property owners or managers voluntarily choose to implement management practices which comply with clean water regulations without being forced to do so by regulation.

Who Supports Voluntary Compliance?

The California Cattlemen's Association, Range Management Advisory Committee to the State Board of Forestry, State Water Resources Control Board, and other industry groups support a voluntary, non-regulatory, locally developed program of management practice implementation.

Is Voluntary Compliance a Viable Alternative to Regulation?

It is up to the livestock industry and private rangeland owners to show that voluntary and cooperative approaches to clean water regulations can be successful. By the year 2000 the livestock industry needs to show measurable progress implementing the voluntary approach described in the California Rangeland Water Quality Management Plan.

How do Environmental Groups and Federal Regulators Feel About Voluntary Compliance?

In public comments received on the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Ammendments some environmental groups indicated that they expect voluntary approaches to fail. The livestock industry must work together to show that voluntary compliance can work.

Who can Help Implement Voluntary Compliance?

Property owners or managers can take advantage of the expertise and incentives offered by a variety of existing state and federal programs geared to promote private actions which could have water quality benefits. Assistance agencies include:

How can Voluntary Compliance be Implemented?

Voluntary compliance may be accomplished individually or in groups.

What are the Benefits of Voluntary Compliance?

What Happens Without Voluntary Compliance?

Option 1: Voluntary Compliance is the first of three options for achieving compliance with clean water regulations. If voluntary compliance is unsuccessful, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) have the authority to invoke the more stringent options.

Option 2: Regulatory-Based Encouragement of Management Practices: This option will set water quality standards or goals (management measures) but will not prescribe specific practices. Regional Boards may encourage management practices by waiving adoption of Waste Discharge Requirements on condition that dischargers comply with management practices. While management practices may be left up to the landowner, a ranch water quality plan may be required by the RWQCB. Regional Boards may also enter into agreements with agencies that have management responsibilities for publicly owned or controlled lands. Once management practices have been formally approved by the State or Regional Board, they will become the primary mechanism for meeting water quality standards.

Option 3: Effluent Limitations: Regional Boards will adapt and enforce Waste Discharge Requirements on proposed or existing nonpoint sources of pollution. Regional Boards are precluded from specifying the manner of compliance with waste discharge limitations. However, limitations may be established at a level that, in practice, would require implementation of appropriate BMPs.

Where are the Biggest Problems?

California has 20 million acres of privately owned rangelands. Water quality concerns are focused on drinking water supplies as well as habitats of trout, salmon, and steelhead. Consequently, the North Coast, northeastern California, and the Sierra Nevada have and will receive increasing attention. These areas are likely to be the first to be regulated if voluntary compliance fails.

This page was revised July 1996. It replaces a fact sheet formerly titled "Water Quality Management Planning: A Local Approach for Rangeland Watersheds".


[Home] [Index] [PreviousPage] [Next Page]

prepared and edited by John Harper, Mel George and Ken Tate