Back to IHRMP Home IHRMP image

Purpose | Personnel | Oak Assistance | Publications | IHRMP Funded Research | Other Links


Second Progress Report
Jan 1988–Jan 1989

University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources
College of Natural Resources, Berkeley
Department of Forestry & Resource Management



December 1989
Previous page Next page

1989 PROGRESS REPORT: UC FUNDED IHRMP RESEARCH
California Black Oak leaf
California black oak
(Q. kelloggii)
Leaf print by Ida Geary


In July 1986, UC funded 12 research projects for periods which varied from 15 months to 5 years. The areas for research funding are keyed to four of the IHRMP’s major program objectives: 1) improve oak regeneration, 2) maintain wildlife habitat diversity, 3) understand the impacts of land-use changes, and 4) develop alternative management strategies. The CDF has funded all research concerned with objective 3 on land-use change. A fifth objective, to monitor the status of resources, is the responsibility of CDF. All available research funds ($235,000 year) were allocated for the first three years of the program.

All funded projects are required to submit annual reports of progress. As of July 1989, five projects have been completed, with final reports submitted for four of the projects. Five additional projects are due for completion during 1989, with final reports due by the end of 1989. In July 1989, 11 new research projects were initiated with funds made available as older projects were completed. The annual and final reports form the basis for this summary of progress for the UC-funded research.

Research Area 1: Improve Oak Regeneration
Public concern over the failure of oaks to regenerate adequately contributed to the initiation of the IHRMP. The first round of research funding recognized the importance of this area for research by allocating the largest portion of available research funds into regeneration. This effort has resulted in significant progress towards understanding the regeneration problem and its solutions.

Work by Plumb and Pillsbury in central California, Lathrop and Riggs in southern California, and Rice, Menke, and Welker in northern California have provided excellent information about the factors which prevent successful natural regeneration and the complex set of conditions which allow for successful regeneration. These projects have been most successful at identifying the factors which have prevented regeneration, including browsing of young plants and competitive interactions between grasses and seedlings. Parker’s work has shown that the soil microflora may play an important role in regeneration success or failure and Zedler and Lawson are investigating the role of fire.

Although much work remains to be done, researchers are beginning to understand the complexities of site and species interactions in regeneration. The research base has now developed sufficiently that successful artificial regeneration is a reality, with well-developed techniques available. Regeneration research now enters a second phase with continuing work on intraspecific genetic variation by Riggs, and continued monitoring of regeneration in natural populations.

Researchers study oak regeneration.
Researchers continue to seek to understand the mechanisms involved in oak regeneration for specific sites.
Projects:

    Parker, V.T. and M. Seidl, San Francisco State University. Ecophysiological responses of oak seedlings during establishment—the influence of mychorrhizae.

    Zedler, P.H. and D. Lawson, San Diego State University. The effect of fire on seedlings and saplings of Engelmann oak and coast live oak.

    Lathrop, E.W. and F.T. Griggs, Loma Linda University. Natural regeneration in the Engelmann oak phase of southern oak woodland.

    Riggs, L.A. and C.I. Millar, GENREC. Genetic variability of California oak species—implications for regeneration on hardwood range.

    Plumb, T.R. and N. Pillsbury, Cal Poly SLO. Oak woodland regeneration.

    Rice, K., J. W. Menke, and J. Welker, UC Davis. Ecology and regeneration of hardwood rangelands—influences of water, herbivory, and competition on stability, productivity, and management options.


Research Area 2:
Wildlife Habitat
A second area of concern which helped produce the IHRMP was the continuing loss of critical wildlife habitat. Two research projects have investigated the basic relationships between hardwoods and wildlife, emphasizing birds and other vertebrates. These studies have established the importance of hardwoods to many wildlife species and will lead to further evaluations of the effects of management. Future research in this area will build on previous studies, but will emphasize the influence of urbanization on wildlife habitat and species diversity, an area of crucial concern.

Projects:

    Morrison, M.L. and W.M. Block, UC Berkeley, Wildlife-habitat relationships in oak woodlands of California.

    Noon, B. and J. Waters, An investigation of the breeding habitat of cavity nesting birds in a hardwood range habitat.

Oak stand growth on Calif's hardwood rangelands
Research Area 3: Changes in Land use
Funding in this area by CDF.

Research Area 4: Management Alternatives
A key to successful hardwood conservation is maintaining the economic potential of the land. Most hardwood land is privately owned and has been historically used for livestock production, an industry with low profitability. The development of alternative management strategies to improve economic efficiency can help reduce pressures for conversion and also lead to more flexibility, which can then allow management for oak regeneration and for wildlife habitat diversity.

A study by Dennis investigated alternative but non-traditional management strategies, including fuelwood plantations, specialized livestock production practices, and recreation development. Standiford and Howitt worked out an economic model for more traditional land uses, while Fitzhugh and Loomis investigated the expanding alternative of fee-hunting operations. Frost and Duncan worked on the development of livestock production practices compatible with oak regeneration. These studies have provided the economic and management information needed for developing and testing alternatives for traditional systems as well as improving overall economic efficiency.

Projects:

    Dennis, N. Jones and Stokes. Alternative management strategies for hardwood range.

    Frost, W. and D. Duncan, Cal State Fresno. Overstory canopy effects on forage production and utilization, and on soil characteristics on hardwood rangeland.

    Standiford, R. and R. Howitt, UC Berkeley. Development of ranch model of California’s hardwood rangelands.

    Fitzhugh, E.L. and J.B. Loomis, UC Davis. Price structures at big game hunting clubs in California.


Summary

The largest share of the research effort has been put into regeneration. This effort has paid off. We now understand the process of stand development and regeneration much better, an understanding sufficient to have developed successful artificial regeneration techniques which are now being applied. Understanding of natural regeneration and the causes for success and failure has come more slowly, and will require a few additional years of research. We now understand basic relationships between hardwoods and vertebrate species, but still need to evaluate the impacts of mitigation, development, and management on those species. Alternative management strategies have been evaluated, with good management and economic models developed for the first time for hardwood rangelands. Evaluation of the impacts of these alternative strategies required development of demonstrations and further evaluation. In conjunction with the research projects, several sites for demonstration of results have been put in place.

Valley Oak leaf
Valley oak (Q. lobata)
Leaf print by Ida Geary
Future Work
The Policy Advisory Committee to the IHRMP met in the spring of 1989 to review research progress and to prioritize future research efforts. $205,000 will be spent on research in fiscal year 1989-90. Of this amount, $69,000 will be spent on continuation of existing projects. The remaining $136,000 will be used to fund new projects in the coming fiscal year. The research areas to be initiated in the coming year are shown below:

    Scott, T.A., UC Riverside. The effects of urbanization on wildlife.

    Duncan, D.A., Private Consultant. Effects of urbanization on wildlife in a large subdivision in the blue oak type in Madera County.

    Byrne, R., E. Edlund, and S. Mensing, UC Berkeley. Long-term changes in structure and extent of oak vegetation types.

    Riggs, L.A., GENREC. Genetic architecture and ecotypic variation in oaks.

    McBride, J.R., and A. Mossadegh, UC Berkeley. Ecotypic variation in blue oak.

    Dahlgren, R.A., M. Firestone, M.J. Singer, UC Davis and Berkeley. Nutrient cycling in managed oak woodland-grass ecosystems.

Robert H. Schmidt

Robert H. Schmidt

Natural Resource Specialist
North Coast Region
Tom Scott

Tom Scott
Natural Resource Specialist
South Coast Region
William Tietje

William Tietje
Natural Resource Specialist
Central Coast Region
Douglas D. McCreary

Douglas D. McCreary
Natural Resource Specialist
North Sierra Region
Neil K. McDougald

Neil K. McDougald
Natural Resource Specialist
South Sierra Region
Richard B. Standiford

Richard B. Standiford
Program Director and
Forest Management Specialist
UC Berkeley

Department of Forestry & Resource Management, UC Extension Specialists

Pete C. Passof

Pete C. Passof
Forest Advisor for UC Cooperative
Extension in Mendocino County
Tom Scott

Ted Adams
Wildlands Specialist
UC Davis


Previous page Next page




























































back to top





















































back to top









































































































back to top | IHRMP Home | Purpose | Personnel | Oak Assistance | Publications | IHRMP Funded Research | Other Links


University of California Integrated Hardwood Range Management Program, UC Berkeley. Last modified: 09/20/01
©Copyright, 2001. The Regents of the University of California. For questions and comments, contact
webmaster.