Second
Progress Report
Jan 1988Jan 1989
University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources
College of Natural Resources, Berkeley
Department of Forestry & Resource Management
December 1989
|
IHRMP EVALUATION STRATEGY
We are firmly committed to providing a detailed analysis of the success of the IHRMP in meeting its stated goals. An independent assessment was recently completed of the IHRMP. This report contains a summary of the current education program, including: techniques in use, audiences being targeted, regional interest and activities, available baseline information, and evaluation efforts to date; a summary of methods for program evaluation; and a proposed evaluation strategy and specific recommendations for procedures and studies.
Proposed action items for evaluation in the upcoming year are:
- Conduct baseline studies: Regional baseline surveys of major audiences in appropriate regions: woodcutters, planners, small and large landowners, resource professionals, nursery operators, environmental groups, and the general public.
- Survey newsletter recipients (Oaks n Folks and Hardwood Habitats).
- Evaluate Network Committees and other cooperative efforts: set objectives, test at appropriate date in the future; survey opinions, roles and responsibilities at beginning and at two-year intervals. Interviews of participants may be most useful. Compare Network Committees in different regions and to those areas without formal committees.
- Conduct formal case study analysis of various IHRMP activities.
- Survey workshop participants from last year. Use standardized workshop evaluation form.
- Conduct interviews (small sample) of landowners and developers who have not had contact with extension on hardwood issues to find out reasons for non-participation (greater insight into interests and needs).
- Compare status of the resource and woodcutter attitudes in Monterey County, which has a woodcutting ordinance, to those of San Benito County, which does not.
 |
 |
|
|