Oaks in California's Changing Landscape Oaks in California's Changing Landscape
Concurrent Sessions

Conference Proceedings

Oak Symposium Home

Click here for CONFERENCE PAPER.

Paper is in PDF format and requires Adobe Acrobat™ Reader to view document.

File size: 750K

Urban Forestry — Abstract of Paper


To Prune or Not to Prune: Responses of Coast Live Oaks (Quercus agrifolia) to Canopy Retention During Transplanting
Rosi Dagit1 and A. James Downer2


A total of 62 Coast Live Oaks (Quercus agrifolia) were monitored since they were initially boxed for transplantation in 1993. At that time, only branches injured during the moving process and deadwood were removed, leaving the entire canopy intact. This was a departure from the usual transplanting methodology that traditionally removes up to 70 percent of the canopy in order to compensate for the massive root loss incurred during boxing. To date, survival of non-pruned trees has exceeded that of a cohort of 25 transplanted oaks that received the standard canopy reduction. A discussion of the impacts of pruning and transplanting on diameter growth, canopy condition and overall health and vigor of the transplanted oak trees is provided.



1Senior Conservation Biologist, Resource Conservation District of the Santa Monica Mountains, 122 N. Topanga Canyon Blvd., Topanga, CA 90290 (e-mail: oaksrus@aol.com)
2Farm Advisor/Environmental Horticulture, University of California Cooperative Extension, 669 County Square Dr., Suite 100, Ventura, CA 93003 (e-mail: ajdowner@ucdavis.edu)




University of California Integrated Hardwood Range Management Program, UC Berkeley. Last Modified: 5/6/02.
©Copyright, 2001. The Regents of the University of California. For questions and comments, contact webmaster.