I.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
II. CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
III. U.S. FISH
AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
IV. USDA SOIL
CONSERVATION SERVICE
V. USDA FARMERS
HOME ADMINISTRATION
VI.
AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION AND CONSERVATION COMMITTEES
I. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
The relationship of the Department of Food and Agriculture and
the University of California has been established and
operative for many years. The agreement on policy between the
University of California and the Department of Food and
Agriculture is reaffirmed and defined as follows:
The University of California and the Department of Food and
Agriculture reaffirm the following policy covering a general
division of labor in education, research service, and
regulatory matters relating to agriculture:
A. The primary functions of education and research, both
resident and Extension, and the interpretation of the
results of research in the fields of animal health,
production, product quality and wholesomeness, and
marketing and distribution of agricultural products are
properly vested, as now, in the University of
California.
B. The primary function of administration and enforcement
of regulatory measures relating to animal health,
production, product quality and wholesomeness, and
marketing and distribution of agricultural products,
including trade promotion, standardization, inspection,
and quarantine services, together with crop and market
news services, are properly vested in the Department of
Food and Agriculture.
C. To accomplish the greater service to the public
interests of the state, it is essential that these two
State agencies cooperate and work in full and complete
harmony with each other. Such harmony will be best
promoted if each avoids the inauguration of activities
properly falling within the purview of the other. To
this end, it is agreed that in all matters requiring the
cooperative efforts of the two agencies, as well as in
respect to their own independent activities, each will
work within the field of its vested functions specified
above.
D. To foster and facilitate the fullest cooperation and
harmony between the two agencies in the performance of
their functions, an informal liaison committee composed
of representatives of each agency shall meet from time
to time as designated by each. This committee shall be
concerned with matters involving or requiring the
cooperative effort of the two agencies and shall
determine the allocation and adjustment of activities in
respect to specific problems whenever they arise as may
be necessary to effect the greatest good.
II. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
A revised interagency memorandum, dated May l, 1978, sets
forth the functional divisions among the USDA Forest Service,
California Department of Forestry, USDA Soil Conservation
Service, and University of California Cooperative Extension,
and provides for the "coordination and cooperation between
agencies providing forestry assistance to California
landowners, timber operators, and wood processors."
A. U.S. Forest Service: (l) provide financial and
technical assistance to other agencies, (2) conduct
research activities through USFS Forest and Range
Experiment Stations, and (3) provide for cooperative
teaching efforts via demonstration areas and workshops
for forest landowners, timber operators, and wood
processors.
B. USDA Soil Conservation Service: (l) provide Resource
Conservation Districts with conservation plans and other
technical assistance, and (2) involve CDF in preparation
of conservation plans requiring technical forestry
assistance.
C. California Department of Forestry (CDF): (l) provide
on-the-ground technical forestry assistance to forest
landowners, timber operators, and wood processors, and
(2) make available California State Forests for
educational purposes, including economic feasibility
studies and conservation practices that affect soil,
water, forage, wildlife, scenic, and recreational
values.
D. Cooperative Extension: provide educational materials,
and programs in forestry based upon research and field
developments, to clientele to include practicing
foresters, forest landowners, timber operators, wood
processors, and the general public concerning techniques
of forest resource protection, management, and
utilization.
All agencies will advise clientele of the availability of
consultants in the private sector who can provide appropriate
services.
The primary design of this agreement is to provide a
coordinated effort to meet the needs of clientele in the
forest industry, and others, as designated above.
III. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Functional arrangements between Region l, Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) of the U.S. Department of the Interior and the
University of California Sea Grant College Program and
Cooperative Extension are set forth in two memoranda of
agreement promulgated in 1978. One agreement involves the Sea
Grant (marine advisory program), and the other involves the
traditional wildlife extension program. The purpose of these
agreements is to provide arrangements between the FWS and the
University of California for more effective procedures for
planning, coordinating, and developing fish and wildlife
advisory services of mutual interest.
The FWS is charged with the responsibility for carrying out
programs relating to fish and wildlife throughout the Nation.
The effectiveness of these programs is contingent upon public
understanding of the program objectives and the biological
basis for such programs. The Cooperative Extension Marine
Advisory and Wildlife Extension efforts function to provide
biological, research, and management information to marine,
coastal, and inland resource users in order to optimize the
understanding, assessment, development, utilization, and
conservation of the renewable natural resources.
All parties to these agreements endeavor to conduct programs
in a cooperative and coordinated effort to avoid duplication.
Responsibilities are enumerated as follows:
A. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1: (1) provide
technical assistance and make published information
available to Cooperative Extension programs, (2)
cooperate in the design, development, and support of
educational materials of mutual interest, and (3)
provide communications on general activities of the FWS
(national and regional) that may be of interest to
Cooperative Extension.
B. Cooperative Extension: (1) provide channels of
communication and distribution of educational materials,
(2) coordinate with the FWS Region 1 the development of
educational programs that are of mutual interest, and
(3) provide general communications regarding programs
and activities that are of mutual interest and concern.
IV. USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
In the field of soil conservation, the function of Cooperative
Extension is to promote the efficient and profitable use of
soil and water resources. Every effort should be made to
coordinate individual farm plan recommendations prepared by
Soil Conservation Service agents with current recommendations
of the County Cooperative Extension Office. Uniform
recommendations for water use, pasture mixtures, cultivation
practices, etc., coming from all governmentally sponsored
agricultural agencies will help reduce confusion on the part
of farmers.
Extension's role is that of an educational agency, and it
should not be involved in the formation of new soil
conservation districts. Extension's responsibility is to
provide all the facts to the landowners involved and let them
decide on the desired course of action.
V. USDA FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION
The services of Cooperative Extension have always been
available to personnel and borrowers of the Farmers Home
Administration. It is the recognized policy of the Farmers
Home Administration to seek and use these services at all
times.
VI. AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION AND CONSERVATION COMMITTEES
County Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation (ASC)
Committees have three types of responsibilities:
developmental, educational, and administrative. By Federal
law, the County Director of Cooperative Extension is an
ex-officio member of the County ASC Committee, but cannot
vote. County Extension staff are responsible for assisting
the County committee in developing programs for the County.
County Extension staff may use the research laboratories to
better agriculture in the County. County Extension staff are
also clearly responsible for the educational aspects of the
program.
County Extension staff need to devote enough time to County
ASC Committee meetings to be able to help in the developmental
and educational phases of the program, but have no
responsibility for the administrative aspects of the County
ASC program or for the following activities:
A. Reviewing and/or approving farmers' requests for
cost-sharing.
B. Budgeting program funds, keeping approvals for cost-sharing
within available funds, and budgeting funds for
technical services.
C. Hearing and making decisions on program appeals or
making findings on violations of program provisions.
D. Determining policy in the local adaptation and
administration of the program.
E. Allocating production and marketing quotas.
--
January 1991